The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gambling.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, but the world-famous celebs were conspicuously consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable sites using both free casino-style games and lucrative rewards, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to mention lawsuit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as standard casinos, only without the oversight, consumer protections and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the business faces allegations of prohibited gambling in a New york city suit that claims VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to 'create a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's declaration below)

'I'm uncertain" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of stars from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any distinctions in between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - games are totally free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the capacity for real gaming losses.

Others lure consumers with pledges of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement displaying Drake's automobiles, airplanes and mansions before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever quit.'

The inconsistency in between sports betting websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps customers never ever buy,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online sports betting sites.'

Social gambling establishments use clients a possibility to play casino-style games with buddies. Players have the alternative to purchase valueless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be utilized to unlock numerous functions within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting customers to obtain other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's vehicles, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7 states, which has assisted to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require normally need recognition. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit customers to send mail-in requests for complimentary sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific guidelines. What's more, gamers are typically rewarded with sweeps coins just for registering, thus giving them a factor to attempt their hands at any number of casino games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is simply a method of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a form of online entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to play at social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever have to spend for an opportunity to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital distinction in between social sweeps and traditional online gaming websites like gambling establishments.'

Think of the method that McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that provide them the possibility to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself does not meet the definition of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all type of daily businesses in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are routinely used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling industry insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, thereby recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last forever and they're typically not tied to casino-style video games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities commonly associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payments, usually 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the common payout portion for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is a minor share of the revenue earned by the business [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, providing consumers the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine prizes. Many of those brick-and-mortar establishments have since been shuttered over claims of unlawful sports betting.

DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos must deal with comparable analysis.

'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have consistently been cited by courts and state chief law officer as essential consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion remained in truth a guise for illegal sports betting.'

Among the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are giving up substantial tax and revenue opportunities as this gambling replaces that carried out through managed channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have sued social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the latest suit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New York state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'prohibited gaming enterprise. '

Apple and Google have likewise been called as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.

'We generally don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com via e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games across most of North America, as we have for more than a decade, producing not just terrific games, user experiences and home entertainment, however likewise ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to strongly defend any claim which might be brought against us.'

The concerns in between traditional online gaming and sweepstakes casinos could prove bothersome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to predict a strong stance versus unlawful sports betting - especially when attempting to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting supposedly illegal gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have an obligation to explain to consumers the distinctions and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'A few of our worths are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state attorneys general rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating illegal gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton